alvagante
commented
11 years ago That's an old piece of code, as far as I remember it was used to provide a NameVirtualHost directive to ensure that the created vhosts could use it as there wasn't such a (needed) line in the RedHat default configs. So I suppose that's why it was there. The fact the port 80 is encoded makes it useless when using vhosts on different ports, so I suppose it must be better parametrized. But I think it's still needed (haven't checked the effect of its removal on a real system, though).
I've been trying to figure out why the apache::redhat class is included on centos/redhat systems. It defines an empty file which sets named hosts to work on port 80. In our case, we're deploying apache behind a proxy so we only want to listen on 8080. This file doesn't necessarily hurt anything but it add config when none is required.
https://github.com/example42/puppet-apache/blob/master/manifests/vhost.pp#L240
Which then loads this file
https://github.com/example42/puppet-apache/blob/master/templates/00-NameVirtualHost.conf.erb
I'd suggest just removing that line of code or that class altogether as it doesn't really do anything or respect config (i.e. port settings)