Open igarny opened 6 years ago
@igarny not sure on what you miss here, the ipv6 family support on RedHat based on the family parameter (and not eventually with ipv6 directly specified in the rule entry?)
All I'm stating is that both approaches for Debian and RedHat on ip rule management differ a lot, where it shouldn't. After all the implementation of the ip stack is very close in both flavors of Linux and the ip commands are the same. Also there is a risk to continue to diverge, them by having people adding specifics for Debian in the respective templates.
Expected Behavior
similar approach as with Debian
ip rule
management #226Actual Behavior
https://github.com/example42/puppet-network/blob/master/templates/rule-RedHat.erb
Steps to Reproduce the Problem
Specifications
Please add this info:
facter -p
on the failing node (at least the OS related facts)