📚 remove redundant paragraph

[Snoopy1866]

I think this paragraph is redundant here.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 90.30%. Comparing base (9fe724e) to head (b4ed72d). Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #987 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 90.30% 90.30% ======================================= Files 24 24 Lines 3507 3507 ======================================= Hits 3167 3167 Misses 340 340 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/executablebooks/MyST-Parser/pull/987/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=executablebooks) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [pytests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/executablebooks/MyST-Parser/pull/987/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=executablebooks) | `90.30% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=executablebooks#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[Snoopy1866]

It appears that some continuous integration processes have failed, but reviewing the console logs hasn't provided me any clarity on the issue because of my poor programming skills. However, I think simply modifying the documentation may not cause such failures.

Is there any other situation which need to be consider? 🤔

[chrisjsewell]

all sorted cheers