choldgraf
commented
1 month ago I think the content looks great to me - I have one suggestion, and curious what people think about it:
What if we added a brief acknowledgements section at the end that briefly described the major contributions each organization made? I don't think it should go into much detail, and we could encourage project participants to write their own "framing" of the event that goes into more detail about funding sources etc, and cross-link to this post for engineering/technical details.
My rationale: I think it's important to recognize the organizational investments / roles that various stakeholders played when we talk about new developments in the MyST / JB ecosystem. That way we can recognize the work that folks did, and incentivize more of this kind of participation moving forward.
Examples of the kinds of stuff I'm thinking of:
- 2i2c got funding, helped organize/convene the meeting, sent team members to work at the meeting, and provided development cycles via Angus
- Curvenote had almost their entire team participate heavily in development cycles throughout the week (even though they didn't receive any funding to do so)
- Others in orgs related to Pythia played their own roles that should be recognized.
[!NOTE] If this isn't straightforward from y'alls perspective, I don't think it needs to block the blog post. 2i2c can always write a short stub post that cross-references this one anyway.
rowanc1
brian-rose
jnywong
Had a quick chat with @choldgraf and he suggested that we put a small funding statement at the bottom of the blog that mentions the pythia grant as well as Curvenote's investment in the week.
@choldgraf if you wanted to take a first pass at the, go for it. I can take that over the line tomorrow if you don't get it done.