codecov[bot]
commented
3 years ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 97.10%. Comparing base (
f16c3a0) to head (918bb16). Report is 53 commits behind head on master.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #103 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 94.08% 97.10% +3.01% ========================================== Files 1 1 Lines 203 207 +4 ========================================== + Hits 191 201 +10 + Misses 12 6 -6 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/executablebooks/sphinx-tabs/pull/103/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=executablebooks) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [pytests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/executablebooks/sphinx-tabs/pull/103/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=executablebooks) | `97.10% <100.00%> (+3.01%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=executablebooks#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Daltz333
foster999
Now uses base docutils classes when builder is unsupported, rather than custom sphinx-tabs nodes.
Added test for successful building with
rinohtype. This includes regression testing of the XML, but not the output pdf. Turns out pdf's are quite awkward to diff!Fixes #99