The current text on the Dig Deeper article for the C# exercise "Reverse String" incorrectly says the StringBuilder approach has the worst performance of those listed, but it's actually the 2nd worst, behind the LINQ-based.
Probably just a typo, for which this PR provides a correction.
The current text on the Dig Deeper article for the C# exercise "Reverse String" incorrectly says the
StringBuilder
approach has the worst performance of those listed, but it's actually the 2nd worst, behind the LINQ-based.Probably just a typo, for which this PR provides a correction.