Closed jiegillet closed 1 year ago
If you want to do it go for it. There is probably nothing to change in the tests since we do not use fuzz testing in exercise tests. But a check that elm-test-rs did not break anything is still required.
On remark, old versions of elm-test do not officially support elm-explorations/test v2, but in practice, I seem to remember that it sort of work (just that fuzz tables which is a new thing are not displayed, but that does not concerns us). So even with students who have not updated their elm-test, it should not cause issue when they call elm-test
locally if they are on the command line and not online.
elm-explorations/test
has received a major update, along withelm-test
andelm-test-rs
. Should we updateelm-test-rs
here? If we do, we will need to update the dependency of every exerciseelm.json
.This is not urgent, as students will not be writing tests, but it would be nice to keep our own tests up to date.