Closed petertseng closed 2 years ago
Looking through the history of PRs to pre-compiled/package.yaml in https://github.com/exercism/haskell-test-runner/commits/main/pre-compiled/package.yaml, it looks like for most of them (all but one), you've sought an opinion from a Haskell track maintainer. That makes sense if the track maintainers are making sure that the packages being added are reasonable. So if that's going to happen every time, maybe an update to https://github.com/exercism/haskell-test-runner/blob/main/.github/CODEOWNERS would be warranted, so that the track maintainers will automatically get added to PRs for that file?
It's just a suggestion; if you think there are cases where a track maintainer's input isn't necessary and therefore it should be left on a case-by-case basis instead of automatically, that's fine too.
I completely agree. PR #54 opened.
Looking through the history of PRs to pre-compiled/package.yaml in https://github.com/exercism/haskell-test-runner/commits/main/pre-compiled/package.yaml, it looks like for most of them (all but one), you've sought an opinion from a Haskell track maintainer. That makes sense if the track maintainers are making sure that the packages being added are reasonable. So if that's going to happen every time, maybe an update to https://github.com/exercism/haskell-test-runner/blob/main/.github/CODEOWNERS would be warranted, so that the track maintainers will automatically get added to PRs for that file?
It's just a suggestion; if you think there are cases where a track maintainer's input isn't necessary and therefore it should be left on a case-by-case basis instead of automatically, that's fine too.