Up until now, we used the x:size label to deviate from the default
reputation that is awarded for a pull request.
This worked well, until we decided to also allow awarding reputation
for opening an issue (but only for large/massive issues), as we already
used the x:size label for an indication of the effort needed to
implement said issue.
To combat this, we decided to switch to using a x:rep label for awarding
reputation, both for pull requests and issues.
This PR adds the x:rep labels.
For backwards compatibility purposes, we still support the x:size
label on pull requests, but recommend using the x:rep label from now
on.
Up until now, we used the
x:sizelabel to deviate from the default reputation that is awarded for a pull request.This worked well, until we decided to also allow awarding reputation for opening an issue (but only for large/massive issues), as we already used the
x:sizelabel for an indication of the effort needed to implement said issue.To combat this, we decided to switch to using a
x:replabel for awarding reputation, both for pull requests and issues.This PR adds the
x:replabels.For backwards compatibility purposes, we still support the
x:sizelabel on pull requests, but recommend using thex:replabel from now on.For more information on reputation and how these labels should be used, check out https://exercism.org/docs/using/product/reputation
ℹ More info: https://github.com/exercism/org-wide-files/commit/e744663a80845868364385b41de57772c2eb67fa 👁 Tracking issue: https://github.com/exercism/org-wide-files/issues/217