Change anagram test case input

[olapokon]

The input for the anagram function is supposed to be a list containing single word strings, as in all other test cases. This test case has multiple words in the same string, separated by whitespace.

[github-actions[bot]]

Hello. Thanks for opening a PR on Exercism. We are currently in a phase of our journey where we have paused community contributions to allow us to take a breather and redesign our community model. You can learn more in this blog post. As such, all issues and PRs in this repository are being automatically closed.

That doesn't mean we're not interested in your ideas, or that if you're stuck on something we don't want to help. The best place to discuss things is with our community on the Exercism Community Forum. You can use this link to copy this into a new topic there.

---

Note: If this PR has been pre-approved, please link back to this PR on the forum thread and a maintainer or staff member will reopen it.

[olapokon]

It's true that this change would make this test equivalent to the "words are not anagrams of themselves (case-insensitive)" test. Keeping it as a single string but removing the spaces is another option (the nearest, but not exact, equivalent to this probably is the test case "anagrams must use all letters exactly once").

It could remain as is, but it is a bit weird that this is the only candidate string that has spaces in it, thus making it necessary to account for whitespace in the solution, which doesn't seem to be intended.

[ErikSchierboom]

It could remain as is, but it is a bit weird that this is the only candidate string that has spaces in it, thus making it necessary to account for whitespace in the solution, which doesn't seem to be intended.

I 100% agree with that. Ideally it should be deprecated, but I don't think we yet have a deprecation option. Not sure what the best option would be

[olapokon]

Changing it from "go Go GO" to "goGoGO" would not make the description invalid and there would be no whitespace. But this PR can be closed without making any changes, if you'd prefer to wait until it is possible to deprecate it.

[ErikSchierboom]

Changing it from "go Go GO" to "goGoGO" would not make the description invalid and there would be no whitespace

That would be perfectly fine with me

[olapokon]

I changed it to a single string without whitespace.

[ErikSchierboom]

The final thing left to do is to, instead of mutating the existing test, you create a new test with a reimplements field that contains the UUID of the old test.

[olapokon]

I just generated a UUID for the new test and pasted it, apparently it should adhere to this pattern '^[0-9a-f]{8}-[0-9a-f]{4}-4[0-9a-f]{3}-[89ab][0-9a-f]{3}-[0-9a-f]{12}$ Should I just modify it myself or is there some particular way these are generated?

[MatthijsBlom]

configlet uuid can generate these.

[olapokon]

Thanks, I used configlet for the UUID.