Closed GroophyLifefor closed 7 months ago
Please use the forum to discuss changes to the problem specs. Please be sure to read the relevant docs and directly address key points there.
https://exercism.org/docs/community/being-a-good-community-member/suggesting-exercise-improvements
A friend of mine who contributed with the Hamming exercise received errors in two places during the test phase and we actually corrected it quickly, but we talked about something and he had a complaint, he found it wrong that the expected output was different in the error case and I agreed with him
Passed fail cases:
Failed test cases:
The code was able to recognize the error and print an output, but we found it pointless to specify this variation of the error, because if I can give the error message, I've already made it that far, so different error outputs are meaningless.
canonical-data: https://github.com/exercism/problem-specifications/blob/main/exercises/hamming/canonical-data.json ref: sintrode