[Cater Waiter] Possible mistake in "categorize_dish" method docstring

[rodrigosantiag]

I think that there's an error in param dish_ingredients param type description in `categorize_dish' docstring.

On "task" introduction is written:

Implement the categorize_dish(<dish_name>, <dish_ingredients>) function that takes a dish name and a **set** of that dish's' ingredients

But on method's docstring the dish_ingredients param type definition is as list

:param dish_ingredients: list - ingredients for the dish.

Looking to method's unit tests, we can see that, in fact, the second method argument is `set'

[github-actions[bot]]

🤖   🤖

Hi! 👋🏽 👋 Welcome to the Exercism Python Repo!

Thank you for opening an issue! 🐍  🌈 ✨

•   If you are requesting support, we will be along shortly to help. (generally within 72 hours, often more quickly).
•   Found a problem with tests, exercises or something else??  🎉
    ◦ We'll take a look as soon as we can & identify what work is needed to fix it. (generally within 72 hours).

​          ◦ If you'd also like to make a PR to fix the issue, please have a quick look at the Pull Requests doc.
             We  💙  PRs that follow our Exercism & Track contributing guidelines!

•   Here because of an obvious (and small set of) spelling, grammar, or punctuation issues with one exercise,
    concept, or Python document?? 🌟 Please feel free to submit a PR, linking to this issue. 🎉

‼️  Please Do Not ‼️ ​        ❗ Run checks on the whole repo & submit a bunch of PRs.               This creates longer review cycles & exhausts reviewers energy & time.               It may also conflict with ongoing changes from other contributors. ​        ❗ Insert only blank lines, make a closing bracket drop to the next line, change a word               to a synonym without obvious reason, or add trailing space that's not an[ EOL][EOL] for the very end of text files.         ❗ Introduce arbitrary changes "just to change things" .         _...These sorts of things are **not** considered helpful, and will likely be closed by reviewers._

• For anything complicated or ambiguous, let's discuss things -- we will likely welcome a PR from you.
• Here to suggest a feature or new exercise?? Hooray! Please keep in mind Chesterton's Fence.
  Thoughtful suggestions will likely result faster & more enthusiastic responses from maintainers.

💛  💙  While you are here... If you decide to help out with other open issues, you have our gratitude 🙌 🙌🏽.
Anything tagged with [help wanted] and without [Claimed] is up for grabs.
Comment on the issue and we will reserve it for you. 🌈 ✨

[BethanyG]

Hi @rodrigosantiag 👋🏽

Thanks for filing this issue! There is indeed a mistake - would you like to submit a PR to fix it? 😉 If not, I'll see if I can get to it this weekend. 😄

[rodrigosantiag]

Hi @BethanyG .

I opened the PR #3187

Regards

[BethanyG]

Hi @rodrigosantiag - Thank you for the PR! It is approved and merged. 😄 Closing this now as fixed. 🌟