Closed visze closed 7 years ago
Update: I tried it with the 7.2.1 Genomiser. And here it gets a phenotype score => 1.0
What is the current status of a new exomiser web? Can I install a web interface local so that our clinicians can use exomiser?
You want to use the version 7.32.3+ - check the releases page for info:
https://github.com/exomiser/Exomiser/releases/tag/7.2.3
There was a bug (see #147) in the way we dealt with multi-sample VCF.
Using this analysis (note proband: B and modeOfInheritance: AUTOSOMAL_DOMINANT)
---
analysis:
vcf: SETD5.vcf
ped: SETD5.ped
proband: B
# AUTOSOMAL_DOMINANT, AUTOSOMAL_RECESSIVE, X_RECESSIVE or UNDEFINED
modeOfInheritance: AUTOSOMAL_DOMINANT
#FULL, SPARSE or PASS_ONLY
analysisMode: PASS_ONLY
geneScoreMode: RAW_SCORE
hpoIds: ['HP:0001249']
frequencySources: [
THOUSAND_GENOMES,
ESP_AFRICAN_AMERICAN, ESP_EUROPEAN_AMERICAN, ESP_ALL,
EXAC_AFRICAN_INC_AFRICAN_AMERICAN, EXAC_AMERICAN,
EXAC_SOUTH_ASIAN, EXAC_EAST_ASIAN,
EXAC_FINNISH, EXAC_NON_FINNISH_EUROPEAN,
EXAC_OTHER
]
pathogenicitySources: [POLYPHEN, MUTATION_TASTER, SIFT]
#this is the standard exomiser order.
steps: [
variantEffectFilter: {remove: [UPSTREAM_GENE_VARIANT,
INTERGENIC_VARIANT,
REGULATORY_REGION_VARIANT,
CODING_TRANSCRIPT_INTRON_VARIANT,
NON_CODING_TRANSCRIPT_INTRON_VARIANT,
SYNONYMOUS_VARIANT,
DOWNSTREAM_GENE_VARIANT,
SPLICE_REGION_VARIANT]},
frequencyFilter: {maxFrequency: 1.0},
pathogenicityFilter: {keepNonPathogenic: true},
inheritanceFilter: {},
omimPrioritiser: {},
hiPhivePrioritiser: {runParams: 'human'}
]
outputOptions:
outputPassVariantsOnly: false
#numGenes options: 0 = all or specify a limit e.g. 500 for the first 500 results
numGenes: 0
outputPrefix: results/SETD5-AUTOSOMAL_DOMINANT
#out-format options: HTML, TSV-GENE, TSV-VARIANT, VCF (default: HTML)
outputFormats: [TSV-GENE, TSV-VARIANT, VCF, HTML]
This was produced:
Which is what you'd expect.
I need to put a change into the current dev version of the web interface to accommodate this fix, but otherwise it should be usable. Bear in mind the web interface only runs the original exomiser algorithm though. This was by design so as to limit the hardware requirements of the server.
Ok. But how you can do that in the exomiser web?
in the actual development there is no additional field
sorry now it is there!
(p.s.: we need to update the documentation)
The gene
SETD5
is associated withMental retardation, autosomal dominant 23
. If I useintellectual disability
/HP:0001249
the phenotype score is 0 (PhenIX and hiPHIVE). The strange thing is that exomiser says correctly that this gene belongs toMental retardation, autosomal dominant 23
. If I use exactly this disease and no hpo-term the same thing happens: 0 phenotype score. It looks for me that SETD5 is not annotated with any HPO-Term. So why nnotation with disease but no HPO-Term? This might be a bug in the software (maybe if the database is generated).Phenomizer can rank the gene. ID is also known by the HPO-brwoser.
Here is an example: VCF:
PED-File: