Open julesjacobsen opened 5 months ago
This would be great. Caveat: Some of the entries are set to "D" without any obvious reason, e.g. RFC2, which is not listed as a disease gene in OMIM.
Yes - spotted that as well and we are going to investigate where that is coming from. Presumably the Orphanet XML. What do you think it means if it is genuine - that LoF of BCL7B alone would cause the syndrome or at least a good part of the symptoms?
On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 9:20 AM Peter Robinson @.***> wrote:
This would be great. Caveat: Some of the entries are set to "D" without any obvious reason, e.g. RFC2, which is not listed as a disease gene in OMIM.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/exomiser/Exomiser/issues/557#issuecomment-2053570000, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABHO4PCHMO3WEJUZCUYO4ALY5DTFXAVCNFSM6AAAAABGEAJ2UOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDANJTGU3TAMBQGA . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
Exomiser <= 14.0.0 will give false positive hits for small sequence variants located in genes associated with contiguous gene deletion disorders mainly from Orphanet, e.g. Williams syndrome ORPHA:904 / OMIM:194050
The confusion arises from the disease-gene associations and the way Exomiser treats the disease type 'C' (copy-number) the same as 'D' (disease). In the case of disease.type = 'C' then the 'gene' needs to be treated as a large contiguous region covering all the associated genes and only matched to large deletions covering ~80/90+% of this region.