Open benjamin-manning opened 4 hours ago
@benjamin-manning Was thinking about this reading your survey but it feels uncommonly needed? A way you can do this now is run the first survey, manipulate responses however you want and store them as scenarios for the follow-on survey (where you use scenarios instead of piping).
@rbyh I subjectively disagree (but not super strongly). I predict that as more people use edsl, a nontrivial number would want to do this. It's a very simple action. But of course, you probably have a better view of what people do or don't want.
I think we can do this somewhat easily - let me think about it.
On Sun, Nov 17, 2024 at 2:52 PM Benjamin Manning @.***> wrote:
@rbyh https://github.com/rbyh I subjectively disagree (but not super strongly). I predict that as more people use edsl, a nontrivial number would want to do this. It's a very simple action. But of course, you probably have a better view of what people do or don't want.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/expectedparrot/edsl/issues/1296#issuecomment-2481498314, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AADDNMWFCLES2AQ5EYP4DH32BDXYLAVCNFSM6AAAAABR6EXDYOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDIOBRGQ4TQMZRGQ . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
It would be very nice if we could do simple mathematical operations when piping answers between survey questions. Take the following picture:
What we really want, is if the base answer was 17, be able to pipe through "between 16 and 18" instead of "between 17-1 and 17-2"
This should work for +-/*. might have a checking thing to make sure it only gets used when the piped question is numeric.