Closed JosiahParry closed 1 year ago
FYI, the R version requirement for rextendr is more stringent than purrr 1.0.0 (4.0 v.s. 3.5), so I think the purrr version requirement is unlikely to be a problem.
Also, as I understand it this only would impact the development of extendr packages. But packages developed with extendr don’t have this same version requirement. Is that right?
Also, as I understand it this only would impact the development of extendr packages. But packages developed with extendr don’t have this same version requirement. Is that right?
Yes, packages created using rextendr have no dependency on rextendr.
As of purrr v 1.0.0 all
_dfr()
suffixes have been superceded. The recommendation now is to usepurrr::list_rbind()
after usingpurrr::map()
though this would require setting a min version to>= 1.0.0
--but since dplyr is imported I thinkbind_rows()
can be used.See related https://github.com/extendr/rextendr/pull/263#discussion_r1174589745
This is not an urgent issue but may become a pain point if any issues are further introduced upstream in a later version of purrr.