Closed kbvernon closed 3 months ago
Do we need all two files, 400 lines each? Can we trim it only to used functions?
Possibly, but if we intend to incrementally update other parts of rextendr to use these standalone checks, maybe we should think about which ones we are likely to use elsewhere (not just for this function) and then trim everything else. What do you think, @JosiahParry?
I think including the files is helpful for the future development of the package. I would suggest to keep them as is.
This is because they add no other dependencies hence "standalone." Together they are 20kb which is very small. If size is a concern we can remove comments and whitespace. But again, this is a utility package, not one that is included in the final binary of another.
Awesome! Thanks! If you all want someone to work on integrating/modifying the standalone checks more, I can probably devote some time to it next month.
@kbvernon , could you please also update NEWS.md
since this is function is a part of public API?
can do! thanks, @Ilia-Kosenkov!
For https://github.com/extendr/rextendr/issues/360