Closed kaenguruhs closed 1 year ago
This adds an API for external applications, reachable via
octopi.local/plugin/TimeToFilament
.
Thanks for your help!
Can you give an example of an external application that would use this?
Maybe this is a silly question but... why not just simply return the data as-is and let the external app deal with the formatting and stuff? Presumably the external app could do whatever it wants.
Hi eyal0,
you got me - Java and not python is my home turf :-) I will go through your suggested changes and add a commit. First of all: The application using this API could be Octodash. There was an issue, but it was closed because of the missing API in TimeToFilament: https://github.com/UnchartedBull/OctoDash/issues/1547
To the formatting-thing: Isn't it quite difficult for external applications to decide how to format it right? E.g.: In my setup, it is neccessary to add +1
to the layer (Layer ${parseInt(this.plugins.TimeToFilament["^;LAYER:(\\d+)"].groups[0])+1} in <b>${formatDuration(this.progress.printTimeLeft - this.plugins.TimeToFilament["^;LAYER:(\\d+)"].timeLeft)}</b>
) because layering starts with 0. I'd like to have all config for this at one place, not distributed. What do you think?
I'll assume that you tested this alright? This is a pretty low-risk feature to add because it'll only affect people that try to use it.
This adds an API for external applications, reachable via
octopi.local/plugin/TimeToFilament
.