At the moment, some of our math utility functions have both constexpr and non-constexpr variants, in different files, while some have only the constexpr ones which work at run-time as well. But - we indicate the first case with the kat::constexpr_ namespace. Is this explained anywhere? Not really. Also unexplained is why math.cuh includes constexpr_math.cuh.
To add to the fun, we have several functions with two implementations, foo_safe() and foo_unsafe(); and - some of the non-safe versions are actually in constexpr_math...
At the moment, some of our math utility functions have both constexpr and non-constexpr variants, in different files, while some have only the constexpr ones which work at run-time as well. But - we indicate the first case with the
kat::constexpr_namespace. Is this explained anywhere? Not really. Also unexplained is whymath.cuhincludesconstexpr_math.cuh.To add to the fun, we have several functions with two implementations,
foo_safe()andfoo_unsafe(); and - some of the non-safe versions are actually in constexpr_math...We should get this stuff in order.