Open SamuelBorn opened 2 weeks ago
I'd prefer it being more compact graphically, e.g.
.
├── a
└── b...
Or making use of unicode elipsis
.
├── a
└── b…
And honestly, if this could be implemented without a runtime impact on the already pretty slow --tree
flag, it may be worth just making this a default, I think we can be that opinionated :p
I'd prefer it being more compact graphically
Yeah that looks also better to me!
Current Issue: Using
eza --tree --level=n
currently provides no indication of additional nested levels, which can lead to confusion about directory contents when only a limited depth is shown.Proposed Solution: Introduce a
--indicate-deeper-levels
flag to mark directories that have further levels beyond the specified depth. A simple indicator (e.g., ...) would clarify that deeper levels exist, improving clarity without altering the specified --level setting.Example
Original Folder Structure
Output of
eza --tree --level=1
Wanted behavior of e.g.
eza --tree --level=1 --indicate-deeper-levels