Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Unable to reproduce.
- No idea of the command line you used.
- Which caches are missing? Only higher cache IDs?
- There is no single version 3.15 - moreover, 3.15 is a completely different
thread.
- Have you passed the GPX files through gpsbabel for verification? If an error
is found, which WID is affected? Can you reproduce the problem with a single
WID query?
- What are the differences between the GPX files written by the two GeoToad
versions?
Original comment by Steve8x8
on 8 Apr 2013 at 8:54
"gpx file broken"
same problem after updating to 3.16.5
using the same settings as before
gpx-file don't work on EasyGPS as before.
Original comment by MrNorm...@gmail.com
on 10 Apr 2013 at 9:14
Still unable to reproduce, with the information (or rather, lack thereof) you
are willing to give. Both the error, and what you've been doing.
If you were me, what would you do next?
Original comment by Steve8x8
on 11 Apr 2013 at 2:02
Sorry for late reply
I will give more informations upcoming weekend.
Maybe I can send the gpx-files
Original comment by dirk.spi...@gmx.de
on 11 Apr 2013 at 5:15
I attached the gpx-file generated with version 3.16.5 which does not work
neither with Garmin Basecamp nor with GPS-Babel.
I did not use any commandline, I just started the geotoad program, choose the
coordinates and distance.
BR
Dirk
Original comment by dirk.spi...@gmx.de
on 13 Apr 2013 at 8:32
Attachments:
and this is the file using geotoad 3.16.0 which is usable
Original comment by dirk.spi...@gmx.de
on 13 Apr 2013 at 8:44
Attachments:
Easy GPS 4.18 willl not open the file 5Days35mora.gpx created with Geotoad
3.16.5
Faulttext:
The Open command could not be completed. The file "5Days35mora.gpx" could not
be opened. This XML file contains one or more errors.
C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\Martin\Desktop\Geotoad_caches\5Days35mora.gpx
<groundspeak:text encoded="False">Under
BUT EasyGPS 4.18 open the file "5Days35mora2.gpx" without any error
Original comment by MrNorm...@gmail.com
on 15 Apr 2013 at 10:58
Attachments:
5Days35mora2.gpx was created with geotoad 3.16.4
Original comment by MrNorm...@gmail.com
on 15 Apr 2013 at 11:01
Passing the files through gpsbabel reveals the basic cause of the problem:
5Days35mora2.gpx: OK
5Days35mora.gpx: GPX: XML parse error at line 64 of '5Days35mora.gpx' :
reference to invalid character number
<groundspeak:text encoded="False">Under Sveriges dövas sportfiskeförbunds årsstämma då loggades den ��</groundspeak:text>
gt_Rehrstieg_52_21147_Hamburg-y5.0.gpx: OK
gt_Rehrstieg_52_21147_Hamburg-y5.0.gpx.BAD: GPX: XML parse error at line 15330
of 'gt_Rehrstieg_52_21147_Hamburg-y5.0.gpx.BAD' : reference to invalid
character number
<groundspeak:text encoded="False">TFTC��</groundspeak:text>
�Þxx; are "UTF-16 surrogates" for so-called "Emoji" characters - for details
see Issue 262. UTF-16 support has been around since early March...
What surprises me is that Issue 262 has first been reported *after* the release
of 3.16.5, and there's no obvious code change between 3.16.4 and 3.16.5 related
to this.
Also the huge difference in file sizes isn't explained... too bad there seems
to be no "verbose" output.
I will try to reproduce the issue on my Linux machine (now that I have an idea
of the parameters used - even with the TUI, there's a full command line being
reported right before running the query - look for the line following the text
"To use this query in the future, type:". Makes things a lot easier.) Since
Windows in some contexts behaves differently, I may fail.
Can both of you in the meantime give 3.17.7 a go? It has some Emoji stuff in,
and for Windows comes with a newer Ruby version.
Original comment by Steve8x8
on 17 Apr 2013 at 8:24
A fix (same as for Issue 262 by the way) has been committted to trunk, and will
be in the upcoming 3.16.6 release which is planned for next week.
As a temporary workaround, one may edit the GPX files affected, e.g.
sed -e 's~\Ø..;\&#x....;~(*)~ig' <old.gpx >new.gpx
(tested with Linux, one might even use the -i flag to edit in-place)
to replace the offending entities with something innocent.
Original comment by Steve8x8
on 17 Apr 2013 at 10:25
I'm seeing other encodings in my recent GPX files that make gpsbabel fail:
<groundspeak:text encoded="False">Gefunden bei Eiseskälte und trüber Sicht.
��</groundspeak:text>
From: http://coord.info/GCRQD5
<groundspeak:text encoded="False">Sehr schöner Weg entlang der Weser, vielen
Dank für den tollen Cache!��</groundspeak:text>
From: http://coord.info/GC3C3MZ
Look at the last two chars. They don't even render correctly in my Firefox/Win
on the geocaching.com page.
Original comment by magic...@gmail.com
on 17 Apr 2013 at 11:56
Oh my goodness. If there are different representations of the same thing
around, people will use all of them, and invent an additional one.
Of course, � is the decimal representation of � (and 56833 maps to xDE01 as
well as 56841 -> xDE09) - I cannot view all of them, but their (3-byte) UTF-8
counterparts are well defined. Nevertheless, there's a reason why the deemoji()
function has a "soft" and a "hard" mode...
Can you check whether a single line just before "if soft" (in
output.rb:deemoji()) fixes the problem for now? It's
text.gsub!(/(\&#(\d+);)/) { ($2.to_i < 32768) ? $1 : ('&#x' + $2.to_i.to_s(16).upcase + ';') }
it's terrible, it's almost unreadable, but it seems to do the job...
Got to find a better place for those entitiy-to-entity conversions though.
Original comment by Steve8x8
on 17 Apr 2013 at 2:20
Yepp, that line seems to work for now.
Original comment by magic...@gmail.com
on 17 Apr 2013 at 5:14
Thanks for confirmation. Your tests are greatly appreciated!
I found no better place for this fix, but using the momentum, I replaced the
hex translations with a general formula (taken from
http://www.unicode.org/faq/utf_bom.html). Rev 1318 should fix the whole
issue(s, as Issue 266 will be merged with Issue 262).
Original comment by Steve8x8
on 18 Apr 2013 at 1:10
Merging with Issue 262...
Original comment by Steve8x8
on 18 Apr 2013 at 1:11
Large attachments removed
Original comment by Steve8x8
on 19 Sep 2013 at 11:02
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
dirk.spi...@gmx.de
on 6 Apr 2013 at 2:42