Closed needleshaped closed 3 years ago
@needleshaped according to this it should be doable, I need to setup a test to see if the archived
flag in the python-gitlab
library works as expected
I was about to create the exact same issue. An exclude archive flag would be a great addition. BTW great project @ezbz 😍
@ezbz great news! And I was going to propose to substruct lists: all subgroups/projects
- archived subgroups/projects
at the cost of parsing gtilab tree twice in https://github.com/ezbz/gitlabber/blob/master/gitlabber/gitlab_tree.py...
I hope passing archived=False
will be possible!
Dear @ezbz, thank you for the tool.
Currently Gitlabber processes all projects, regardless of
archived
status. Can we parameterize it and skip those? I believe it fits the original goal of the project perfectly.Workaround is to actual move projects to dedicated group, and then ignoring it, e.g.
-x '{.*(archived-project$).*}'
, which is suboptimal.Logs: