search

f-o-a-m / kepler

A Haskell framework that facilitates writing ABCI applications
https://kepler.dev
Apache License 2.0
34 stars 9 forks source link

Decide travis build strategy #196

Closed kejace closed 4 years ago

kejace commented 4 years ago

There's a PR for each of these branches.

Clearly either of the branches is superior to master. Question is, is there any advantage to the staged build in minimal-travis?

master minimal-travis plain-travis
number of jobs 8 4 2
runtime 17 min 48 sec 40 min 39 sec 16 min 23 sec
total 1 hr 5 sec 39 min 47 sec 16 min 23 sec
example https://travis-ci.com/f-o-a-m/hs-abci/builds/144765942 https://travis-ci.com/f-o-a-m/hs-abci/builds/144828148 https://travis-ci.com/f-o-a-m/hs-abci/builds/144831220
martyall commented 4 years ago

How is there anything to debate? clearly plain-travis wins?

kejace commented 4 years ago

I was under the impression that stages helped for tests, but if not, then I agree.

Sent from ProtonMail Mobile

On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 14:12, Martin Allen notifications@github.com wrote:

How is there anything to debate? clearly plain-travis wins?

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.

martyall commented 4 years ago

closed by #195