Closed fabiolimace closed 3 years ago
Added more tests for base-n codecs. The decoding speed was increased for base-36, base-58, and base-62. But encoding speed was decreased for the same codecs. It's still very good.
List of changes:
Benchmarks before:
------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units ------------------------------------------------------------------ -Throughput.decode_base36 thrpt 5 4598,355 ± 60,168 ops/ms -Throughput.decode_base58 thrpt 5 5125,792 ± 64,979 ops/ms -Throughput.decode_base62 thrpt 5 5157,235 ± 40,137 ops/ms ------------------------------------------------------------------ -Throughput.encode_base36 thrpt 5 1077,678 ± 9,852 ops/ms -Throughput.encode_base58 thrpt 5 1201,396 ± 25,900 ops/ms -Throughput.encode_base62 thrpt 5 1218,330 ± 14,767 ops/ms ------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmarks after:
------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units ------------------------------------------------------------------ Throughput.decode_base36 thrpt 5 5549,047 ± 63,524 ops/ms Throughput.decode_base58 thrpt 5 6387,853 ± 127,972 ops/ms Throughput.decode_base62 thrpt 5 6333,792 ± 164,613 ops/ms ------------------------------------------------------------------ Throughput.encode_base36 thrpt 5 736,239 ± 12,396 ops/ms Throughput.encode_base58 thrpt 5 835,961 ± 25,055 ops/ms Throughput.encode_base62 thrpt 5 836,418 ± 24,241 ops/ms ------------------------------------------------------------------
Test coverage: 90.0%
Released version 3.7.2.
Added more tests for base-n codecs. The decoding speed was increased for base-36, base-58, and base-62. But encoding speed was decreased for the same codecs. It's still very good.
List of changes:
Benchmarks before:
Benchmarks after:
Test coverage: 90.0%