Closed JMKIM-OBELAB closed 1 month ago
Thank you @JMKIM-OBELAB.
I've updated the word list to pass spell check tests.
@fNIRS/snirf_maintainers, do we need to test this with the validator?
Thank you @JMKIM-OBELAB.
I've updated the word list to pass spell check tests.
@fNIRS/snirf_maintainers, do we need to test this with the validator?
Do you mean testing their OBELAB files with the validator? No, we never did this with any other vendor, also not with us.
Or do you mean checking if the repo is still intact? The spellcheck action should have checked that. So I think everything is fine here.
Yes, I was wondering if we should check vendor files before adding as supported in the specs.
Alright sounds good then.
I think it's the vendor's responsibility to check whether their files really conform to the specs, it should not be our task (also e.g. in our case there are 100s of possible file types, like single device, multiple devices, with aux channels, without, etc, so it's a Herculean task without known device details).
Dear Collaborators,
We have recently released measurement tool and analysis tool fully compatible to snirf format using NIRSIT system.
I added OBELAB as a vendor supporting snirf data format.
If there's further information needed, I am happy support.