Open alexpantyukhin opened 3 years ago
There are still some problems with parsing type's. But going to fix that soon.
Great effort! Keep up the good work!
Parser in progress. Tested it today on whole pyi files in https://github.com/python/typeshed/tree/master/stdlib . it raises error in 175 cases from 885 files. Keep working with this.
That is really great progress!! Sorry I haven't had much time to look at it yet since I have been busy with the compiler (and Jupyter).
Now there are 12 files from whole typeshed
raises error (some except situation for stdlib
and left for protobuf
from stubs
). Now I'm thinking how it could be best way to generate the Fable AST and compile it to files. I guess It's the time where I can move forward with this.
@alexpantyukhin Not sure I understand what you mean about generate Fable AST? Why Fable AST? Did you mean F# AST to generate F#?
Btw please note the new [<NamedParams(fromIndex=1)>]
, e.g: https://github.com/fable-compiler/Fable.Python/blob/main/src/stdlib/Builtins.fs#L123 on how to handle e.g named only arguments and methods with optional arguments.
There is parser in progress for parsing PYI ast: https://github.com/alexpantyukhin/PythonParser From tests it seems that now it's possible to parse some simple modules without 'IF's.