Closed Fa20 closed 2 months ago
Hi Fa20, thanks for reaching out. In order for us to help you best it's useful to format questions with context on your goal/application, code that we can directly run on our side, and direct ptr to the issue vs the expected behavior. If you could provide that, that would be awesome. Thank you :)
@mgarrard
from ax.service.ax_client import AxClient, ObjectiveProperties
from ax.utils.measurement.synthetic_functions import hartmann6
from ax.utils.notebook.plotting import init_notebook_plotting, render
init_notebook_plotting()
ax_client = AxClient()
ax_client.create_experiment(
name="hartmann_test_experiment",
parameters=[
{
"name": "x1",
"type": "range",
"bounds": [0.0, 1.0],
"value_type": "float", # Optional, defaults to inference from type of "bounds".
"log_scale": False, # Optional, defaults to False.
},
{
"name": "x2",
"type": "range",
"bounds": [0.0, 1.0],
},
{
"name": "x3",
"type": "range",
"bounds": [0.0, 1.0],
},
{
"name": "x4",
"type": "range",
"bounds": [0.0, 1.0],
},
{
"name": "x5",
"type": "range",
"bounds": [0.0, 1.0],
},
{
"name": "x6",
"type": "range",
"bounds": [0.0, 1.0],
},
],
objectives={"hartmann6": ObjectiveProperties(minimize=True)},
parameter_constraints=["x1 + x2 <= 2.0"], # Optional.
outcome_constraints=["l2norm <= 1.25"], # Optional.
)
import numpy as np
def evaluate(parameterization):
x = np.array([parameterization.get(f"x{i+1}") for i in range(6)])
# In our case, standard error is 0, since we are computing a synthetic function.
return {"hartmann6": (hartmann6(x), 0.0), "l2norm": (np.sqrt((x**2).sum()), 0.0)}
para,index=ax_client.attach_trial(
parameters={"x1": 0.9, "x2": 0.9, "x3": 0.9, "x4": 0.9, "x5": 0.9, "x6": 0.9}
)
ax_client.complete_trial(trial_index=index, raw_data=evaluate(para))
ax_client.generation_strategy.trials_as_df > >```
Hi @Fa20 - could you provide a snippet of what logs etc you get from running `ax_client.generation_strategy.trials_as_df
?
@mgarrard
Hi @Fa20 after doing some digging, this is because the trial is manually created. I have put up a fix and will update this thread once the fix lands on master
@Fa20 fix has landed on main in https://github.com/facebook/Ax/pull/2577?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR3pIbAgHtQo5_malc-4Zo2rV7abaTxaFDOKb433YIJnhJjm36O1pH91ty8_aem_ZpjRscYOJhQC9ZYipO-akQ , we are planning to do an ax release later this week and this will be on the most update to date version of Ax. Will close the task once we cut the release
@Fa20 fix has landed on main in #2577 , we are planning to do an ax release later this week and this will be on the most update to date version of Ax. Will close the task once we cut the release
Hi Mia @mgarrard , excited to hear about the new Ax release! Would you be able to give a glimpse of a few of the major changes, if any?
Hey @Abrikosoff, this will be a general maintence release, and all the updates will be summarized in the release post -- I'm actually going to cut it Monday because we're close to the weekend now. Will link it here for you when it's done. As far as major upgrades, we are planning a bigger release end of year/ early next year to expose some more advanced methods and improve the usability of our framework :)
Closing the issue as the release just went out that includes the fix: https://github.com/facebook/Ax/releases/tag/0.4.1 cc @Fa20 and @Abrikosoff (release notes have all updates)
Hallo Ax team,
I attached some trials but I can not display the attached trial as completed trial using :
ax_client.generation_strategy.trials_as_df