Closed mgarrard closed 6 days ago
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D62553827
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D62553827
Attention: Patch coverage is 99.37107%
with 1 line
in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 95.68%. Comparing base (
d738685
) to head (e95327f
).
Files with missing lines | Patch % | Lines |
---|---|---|
.../modelbridge/generation_node_input_constructors.py | 96.96% | 1 Missing :warning: |
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
This pull request has been merged in facebook/Ax@549adf0cc9de77b604049632fa7831bcefcb43f3.
Summary: This is a requested follow up by Liz/Sait/Daniel to (1) ensure all constructor methods share the same signature and (2) ensure that they are all tested.
For two, this still relies on best effort to ensure that when you add a new constructor you actually add the relevant tests, but it will ensure that the new constructor has the correct signature.
These input constructors are more simple than those used in the modeling layer so i do believe they should be less error prone generally
Follow up diffs:
Differential Revision: D62553827