codecov-commenter
commented
10 months ago Codecov Report
Attention: 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
Comparison is base (
85beb07) 87.89% compared to head (318d708) 87.90%.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #419 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 87.89% 87.90% +0.01% ========================================== Files 39 39 Lines 9054 9054 ========================================== + Hits 7958 7959 +1 + Misses 1096 1095 -1 ``` | [Files](https://app.codecov.io/gh/facebook/akd/pull/419?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=facebook) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [akd\_core/src/verify/base.rs](https://app.codecov.io/gh/facebook/akd/pull/419?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=facebook#diff-YWtkX2NvcmUvc3JjL3ZlcmlmeS9iYXNlLnJz) | `91.62% <50.00%> (ø)` | | ... and [1 file with indirect coverage changes](https://app.codecov.io/gh/facebook/akd/pull/419/indirect-changes?src=pr&el=tree-more&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=facebook):umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
The comment for this check was backwards -- it should be that we are checking that proof.longest_prefix is a prefix of the proof's label. (The code was correct, the comment wasn't)