Closed xp44mm closed 2 years ago
This would conflict with jsx fragment syntax i.e <> .... </>
. The definition of </>
would be overloaded right?
<div><p>some text</><></></>
Is this ^ more readable than ?
<div><p>some text</p><></></div>
Personally I felt like we wouldn't pursue in this direction. Feel free to reopen if any one has a strong second opinion on this.
Do you want to request a feature or report a bug? feature
What is the current behavior?
What is the expected behavior? because the html tag always pairs, so if simple write better?
it means that the close tag can be
</>
also can be</p>
.