facebook / react

The library for web and native user interfaces.
https://react.dev
MIT License
227.87k stars 46.51k forks source link

Document how React's onChange relates to onInput #3964

Closed graue closed 9 years ago

graue commented 9 years ago

It would be nice for the Forms doc to be more explicit about the fact that React's onChange supersedes, and should generally be used in place of, the DOM's built-in onInput event. People might be used to using onInput instead for text inputs and textareas, since, with the raw DOM, the change event for these controls doesn't fire until the control loses focus.

AnSavvides commented 9 years ago

Opened a PR to address this: #4003

AnSavvides commented 9 years ago

Merged, hurray, we can close this now! :tada:

sunyang713 commented 8 years ago

wait but why?

mnpenner commented 8 years ago

Yeah...why? I don't understand why React chose to make onChange behave like onInput does. As fas as I can tell, we have no way of getting the old onChange behaviour back. Docs claim it's a "misnomer" but it isn't really, it does fire when there's a change, just not until the input also loses focus.

For validation, sometimes we don't want to show validation errors until they're done typing. Or maybe we just don't want a re-render on every keystroke. Now the only way to do that is with onBlur but now we also need to check that the value has changed manually.

It's not that big of a deal, but it seems to me like React threw away a useful event and deviated from standard behaviour when there was already an event that does this.

evpozdniakov commented 8 years ago

Agree with mnpenner.

With onChange fireing on every keystroke, my redux store changes simultaneously. To avoid that, I have to use onBlur.

Finally, we have two events - onInput and onChange - which work same manner.

piotr-cz commented 7 years ago

Besides there is no easy workaround to replicate such behaviour for the <input type="range" /> element.

Native events behave such way that moving the slider around triggers an onInput event and releasing it triggers onChange.

bcherny commented 7 years ago

Another note: Autofill events (at least on Chrome/OSX) trigger onInput, but not onChange! So if I want to capture a change event to an input that might be filled using Chrome's autofill feature, I need to bind to both onInput (to detect keystrokes and autofill) and onChange (to placate React [1]).

[1]

Warning: Failed form propType: You provided a value prop to a form field without an onChange handler. This will render a read-only field. If the field should be mutable use defaultValue. Otherwise, set either onChange or readOnly. Check the render method of StatelessComponent.

ddelrio1986 commented 6 years ago

@mnpenner, @evpozdniakov for validation messages or things that you want to wait until they stop typing for use debounce in your event handler instead of waiting until onBlur.

fabiosantoscode commented 5 years ago

Still no way of using onChange? I've been writing lots of logic to get around not having a real change event.

I think to be a better abstraction, React needs to stick to onChange and let us use onInput without a silly warning.

Validation has never been this hard.

graue commented 5 years ago

For better or worse, this has been the behavior for quite a while, and many React users rely on it.

IMHO, it's probably too late in the game to totally change what "onChange" means in React. But if you feel strongly, maybe do a quick PR to propose a solution with a sensible upgrade path? (Before spending a lot of time on it, get the thoughts of the core team.)

fabiosantoscode commented 5 years ago

Right @graue, I've suggested #14857 instead to create a new event and minimise breaking changes.

alamothe commented 5 years ago

Definitely a huge design issue with React. Hope it doesn't stay this way forever

qtv100291 commented 4 years ago

This is a mistake or a feature :/

milessorce commented 4 years ago

This is a mistake or a feature :/

Features are supposed to be useful... this is the opposite of useful.

artium-ryanh commented 2 years ago

For anyone who needs a workaround to get true onChange behavior, you can implement your own component to use HTML's built-in onchange event. Here's how I've done it, inspired by Kaspar Ettar's solution here. Kaspar's allows you to use both onchange and oninput, mine is just for onchange.

import { Component, InputHTMLAttributes } from 'react';

export interface OnChangeInputProps {
    onChange?: (target: HTMLInputElement) => void;
}

/**
 * This component restores the 'onChange' behavior of JavaScript.
 *
 * See:
 * - https://reactjs.org/docs/dom-elements.html#onchange
 * - https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/3964
 * - https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/9657
 * - https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/14857
 */
export class OnChangeInput extends Component<Omit<InputHTMLAttributes<HTMLInputElement>, 'onChange' | 'onInput' | 'ref'> & OnChangeInputProps> {
    private readonly registerCallbacks = (element: HTMLInputElement | null) => {
        if (element) {
            const onChange: (event: Event) => void = (event) => {
                const target = (event.currentTarget!) as HTMLInputElement;
                this.props.onChange!(target);
            };
            element.onchange = this.props.onChange ? onChange : null;
        }
    };

    public render() {
        return <input type="text" ref={this.registerCallbacks} {...this.props} onChange={undefined} onInput={undefined} />;
    }
}
dijonkitchen commented 2 years ago

Looks like there is an official answer now:

https://reactjs.org/docs/dom-elements.html#onchange

mnpenner commented 2 years ago

@dijonkitchen I don't think that's new. See https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/3964#issuecomment-219575696

andrechalella commented 1 year ago

It is really aggravating, this "official answer". How presumptuous of them to call the HTML Spec official and consolidated event name a "misnomer".

jimmythecoder commented 8 months ago

2024 and issue still exists, this one wasted a serious chunk of time, atleast I now have an answer but if I didnt trust facebook before I sure dont trust them now. Always follow the spec, there should be no alternative breaking change or not.

lolloz98 commented 2 months ago

Guys for people looking to do it with functions, expanding on Ettar solution, this seems to be working (here I am using MUI component, but input component works as well):

import { TextField } from "@mui/material";

export default function MyCustomInput() {
    const registerCallbacks  = (element: HTMLInputElement | null) => {
        if (element) {
            element.onchange = (e) => console.log("onChange", (e.target as HTMLInputElement).value);
            element.oninput = (e) => console.log("onInput");
        }
    };

    return (
        <TextField label="Outlined" variant="outlined" inputProps={{ref:registerCallbacks, onChange: undefined, onInput: undefined}} />
    );
}