Closed igoryusha22 closed 6 months ago
The current class names are deterministic (ie stable) and don't clash with any other potential styling systems, which makes them safer and easier to scale than having a sequential or iterative naming method
@necolas but it is less performant compare to one letter classnames, is not it?
There is no significant difference in performance. Even if it were, performance at the cost of reliability is the wrong trade off
@necolas hm. Could not you please expand your point of view about reliability? What's wrong with sequential or iterative naming methods?
What's wrong with sequential or iterative naming methods?
This kind of approach makes caching impossible. If you don't compile in the same order, you get different results. You can't do partial compiles. You can't do hot-reloading. etc. etc.
Describe the feature request
Please give us a small sizes for class names as it was introduced from the beginning.