Open harsh-vardhhan opened 7 years ago
The nuclide feature I miss the most
Yeah, I would love to have this feature right now.
I posted a temp solution to this: https://github.com/guiguan/ide-flowtype-coverage
apm install ide-flowtype-coverage
Hope ppl in FB can fix this soon :P
Temporary Solution:
nuclide
along with atom-ide-ui
.nuclide
and disable atom-ide-ui
. [It won't allow you to enable both packages] you'll be able to have type coverage along with the benefits of atom-ide-ui
.
Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't nuclide a superset of atom-ide-ui? So that would make sense that it would work but doesn't really solve the problem of not having coverage in atom-ide-ui
.
We are investigating alternative implementations of type coverage (without Nuclide's type coverage UI).
@johnhaley81 true it was suppose to be but for now this is the only solution to get best of the both world's.
Nuclide is too heavy to me. Definitely, prefer a more lightweight solution
@guiguan how come your solution isn't a PR to this repo? Feel like the temporary status could move quicker if it was. 😄
It would be nice to re-prioritize this work now that Nuclide is shutting down, there isn't an easy work-around anymore. This is one of the biggest holes working with Flow types not providing the coverage you think you are getting, so it would have a lot of impact to have a feature that would highlight all of the any
types.
I wrote this up here: https://github.com/facebookarchive/atom-ide-ui/issues/142
It's not showing percentage of code whose type definition is available.