Open AlessioPallotti opened 2 months ago
Hi, it's quite difficult for me to debug "blindly". Can you share some visuals? In general, you're right that more freedom means higher response. I can only think of one exception: when you have S-shape curves, and allow -100% for lower constraints, the algo might prefer a lower than a higher spend point. The reason is that every S-curve will always have 2 symmetrical points that have the same slope, located on the lower and upper part of the curve. That's why -100% might not be the most practical.
Hello,
I have a problem regarding the allocator. Can you tell me why I have a higher "total response increase" value if I set a variation of +-50% for each variable than if I put +-100% as variation limits? Conceptually I should expect a greater or at most equal value in the case where I have +-100% variation. Also, there are some special cases where in the output of the allocator sometimes it does not print me the results for all the variables but only for some of them.
Thank you very much!