Closed JakeHillion closed 1 month ago
Noice. Any reason not to use a more recent release of folly?
Nope! This is the upstream base of the old modified branch, I'll try the latest hash, should be fine.
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 60.78%. Comparing base (
8d83ae1
) to head (e434767
).
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Currently we pull a modified folly repository to be able to use it header only. The only difference in this repository is adding the
folly-config.h
file. Pull this patch into this repo instead and use upstream folly.Bump folly to latest main as well.
Test plan: