Is it difficult to train/finetune ConvNeXtv2 compared with ConvNeXtv1?

[linhduongtuan]

Dear authors, I have played around both ConvNeXt v1 and yours using TIMM codebase with my own datasets. Using V1 I don't struggle with training/finetuning for my datasets and am pleasure with my obtained overall performance for TIMM's variants. However, I can not achieve any comparative performance (overall accuracy as well as computed costs, of course) using your V2 variants with regarding every pretrained weights.

Can you give me any tip, trick, or treat for a set of your hyperparameters?

Thank in advance. Linh

[shwoo93]

Thanks for noting this issue. One suggestion is to not weight decay the gamma/beta values in GRN during training (now updated as default behavior).

[linhduongtuan]

Thank for your explanation. I will try these models again.

[linhduongtuan]

I have been trying to train model ConvNeXt-V2-Tiny again following your new setup for the optimization. However, my obtained results, which don't not improve an overall accuracy as well as need much GPU memory comparing with V1, are still much lower than that of using ConvNeXt-Tiny. Can you double check the optimization recipe using CIFAR, MNIST, ect., for instance? Linh

[Metal079]

Can confirm it's difficult to fine-tune. ConvNextV1-base gets me 86%-88% on my dataset within 5 epochs while ConvNextV2-Base can't seem to get over 81% no matter how I tweak the hyperparameters.

[hbellafkir]

any updates on this issue? I'm having the same problem

[blackpearl1022]

@Metal079 Any updates ? I have same issues on my side.

[Metal079]

@Metal079 Any updates ? I have same issues on my side.

No