Closed lbaermann closed 2 years ago
We appreciate the detailed question Leonard. And you're absolutely right, the current arxiv paper reflects an earlier version of the dataset. There is an arxiv update coming (I believe tonight actually!) that should certainly line up with the numbers you're seeing, which look accurate to me.
(Some of the data was withheld from the earliest version of the dataset, and a much larger set of annotations will be available later this year in a dataset update.)
Please do let us know once that's out if you notice any other gaps!
Dear Ego4D-Team,
thanks again for the dataset! I am currently working with the NLQ data, and it seems the number of samples does not match the numbers reported in the paper.
nlq_val.json
, I get the following numbers:Am I missing something?
Furthermore, I noticed that a small amount of NLQ annotations have no query:
in train and
6d490d22-8ba3-4f13-82ad-ab1ec9074cfe_8
in valThanks for your help in advance!