Closed zc-alexfan closed 3 years ago
Hi,
As many people got confused between all/machine_annot/human_annot and train/test/val, I've decided to provide only all split.
So, the question to your answer is : yes. all json files are all
split. Do you want machine_annot
and human_annot
?
I see. Do you also have machine_annot
and human_annot
?
Another question: for 5 FPS, the v1.0 version differs from v0.0 in terms of number of images? I ran my experiments for my submission using v0.0. I guess I need to rerun them on v1.0.
I can provide annotation ids of machine_annot
and human_annot
so that you can use them from all
.
In both 5 and 30fps, v1.0 provides full images as written in here. v0.0 has only half of full images.
That works. Thanks
Hi @mks0601,
Thanks for your great work. I also need the split for machine_annot and human_annot. But I only found the 'train' and 'test' splits for machine_annot and human_annot, while the original annot has 'train', 'val', and 'test' splits. What is the correspondence?
Thanks
got it, thanks
I have been using v0.0 and recently need to adapt to the new v1.0 version. The naming convention for the annotation files seems to have changed a lot. My code is expecting the different splits for train, val, test in terms of
all
,machine_annot
,human_annot
. However, the current annotation look like the following:Are they all the
all
split? Or how do I find themachine_annot
, andhuman_annot
?