However, this repository is licensed under CC-BY-NC, which does not satisfy the definition of Open Source by the Open Source Initiative (section 6 in particular).
https://opensource.org/docs/definition.php
If this choice of license isn't intentional, it would be really appreciated if you could kindly consider switching to a more commonly used software license :D
I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice. Opinions expressed here are solely of my own and does not represent those of my employer or any other affiliations.
Thank you for this awesome project!
However, this repository is licensed under CC-BY-NC, which does not satisfy the definition of Open Source by the Open Source Initiative (section 6 in particular). https://opensource.org/docs/definition.php
See also, https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/9805/can-i-license-my-project-with-an-open-source-license-but-disallow-commercial-use
In addition, Creative Commons recommend against use of their licenses for software in general. https://creativecommons.org/faq/#can-i-apply-a-creative-commons-license-to-software
If this choice of license isn't intentional, it would be really appreciated if you could kindly consider switching to a more commonly used software license :D
I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice. Opinions expressed here are solely of my own and does not represent those of my employer or any other affiliations.