Closed clane9 closed 2 years ago
Hi @clane9
Thanks for your interest in this work. That is actually a good remark and we quickly tried some semi-supervised extension of the DINO loss. However, we found that different data augmentations were optimal for the supervised / SSL part of the loss and so the overall pipeline was a bit complicated.
On another side, I'd recommend our ICCV21 paper PAWS that extends SwAV to semi-supervised learning.
Thank you for releasing this code! DINO seems like it would naturally extend to the semi-supervised setting by adding a classification loss for any samples with labels. Have you tried something like this? Does it work? Thanks in advance!