Closed awni closed 3 years ago
Do we want to commit a more minimal .ipynb
- maybe one that doesn't have cells that have already all been run?
I think it's helpful to include cells that have been run-- more instructive.
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 2:41 AM Jacob Kahn notifications@github.com wrote:
Do we want to commit a more minimal .ipynb - maybe one that doesn't have cells that have already all been run?
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/facebookresearch/gtn/pull/26#issuecomment-707935092, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAZFLOYCXUXVIJLLJRHIC2LSKSNOXANCNFSM4SNKLBPQ .
I agree, I think we should keep the cells. Then it will render properly in GitHub and can be read without needing to run it. (It's not working properly right now for some reason, I'll need to investigate this).
A linear chain crf notebook and example.