Closed yingchengyang closed 1 year ago
I suspect you're using the models from here: https://github.com/facebookresearch/habitat-lab/tree/main/habitat-baselines/habitat_baselines
That's part of our 2019 ICCV release. At that time, we did find RGBD models performing poorly, but the code has changed a lot since then so it's hard to be confident why you're seeing what you're seeing.
I would recommend using the models from the DD-PPO paper here: https://github.com/facebookresearch/habitat-lab/tree/main/habitat-baselines/habitat_baselines/rl/ddppo
Or even better our most recent models from the HM3D paper here: https://github.com/facebookresearch/habitat-matterport3d-dataset/tree/main/pointnav_comparison
Habitat-Lab and Habitat-Sim versions
Habitat-Lab: master
Habitat-Sim: master
❓ Questions and Help
Thanks a lot for designing such an excellent codebase for Embodied AI! I have some questions about the performance of pretrained models provided in habitat_baselines.
I have tested trained RGB, RGBD, and Depth PPO models for Gibson 100 trajectories. The success rate of the RGB model and the Depth model is 0.77 and 0.90 respectively, which are extremely great. Unfortunately, the success rate of the RGBD model is only 0.15. Does the use of the RGBD model require some special treatment?
Thank you!