Open ranjitkathiriya544 opened 5 days ago
Hi, @ranjitkathiriya544.
Are you able to move the calibration pattern closer to the camera or print a larger calibration pattern? Could you explain your use case? Maybe that would help us understand the need to have a calibration pattern that takes up a small portion of the camera's field of view.
I'm not terribly familiar with Ocean's square array pattern calibration process, but I imagine that calibration pattern taking up a large portion of the field of view of the camera is desirable. So the behavior you observed may be intentional and true to design rather than a bug.
our camera and the pattern distance is 2.6 meters, and also the maximum size of pattern A1.
With OpenCV it works fine, we are comparing the both methods.
I've been able to reproduce your problem with the large image you attached to the Issue. Unfortunately, it turns out that Ocean's calibration pattern detector is not very robust to visible edges that are not part of the pattern itself. If I start with your image and use gimp to fill the red background (and the "Scene" text) with white, the pattern is detected successfully and the code you posted in your now-closed issue seems to work, after correcting the number of columns to 3. For a quick fix, if it's possible to put the calibration pattern in front of a quiet white background, the detector is likely to work better. We will work on making the detector more robust and hope to have an improvement for you next week.
Hi @ranjitkathiriya544,
Could you share with us the field of view and resolution figures for your camera?
And is this an RGB camera or monochrome? And is there anything special about the lighting conditions or objects visible in the background?
Thanks for the reply,
I have added an example of a patten below, that might failed in scenario.
what I have observed, that if you crop a image, in below way then I can be able to detect. That's proofs 2 point.
Originally posted by @ranjitkathiriya544 in https://github.com/facebookresearch/ocean/issues/40#issuecomment-2384135730