Open ryanliu30 opened 3 months ago
Yes, I just debugged at the position, this is a terrible bug that behaves differently against the document.....
This should be fixed ASAP really.
Hi,
we don't plan to support ScaledDotProduct
further (and actually will deprecate it).
This is because it was done before Flash-Attention happened, and now it's not longer competitive, except with absurdly/unusably high levels of sparsity
🐛 Bug
The sparse implementation is never triggered with ScaledDotProduct
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior: Following the documentation, I tested
and launch
the output is
the output is
in two different processes and the numbers reported by the two programs are identical. The improvement reported in the documentation seems to be coming from python/cuda internal optimization
Expected behavior
The one with fraction 0.9 should improve.
Environment
Collecting environment information... PyTorch version: 2.3.0+cu121 Is debug build: False CUDA used to build PyTorch: 12.1 ROCM used to build PyTorch: N/A
OS: Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS (x86_64) GCC version: (Ubuntu 11.3.0-1ubuntu1~22.04.1) 11.3.0 Clang version: Could not collect CMake version: Could not collect Libc version: glibc-2.35
Python version: 3.11.9 (main, Apr 19 2024, 16:48:06) [GCC 11.2.0] (64-bit runtime) Python platform: Linux-5.15.0-78-generic-x86_64-with-glibc2.35 Is CUDA available: True CUDA runtime version: 12.1.105 CUDA_MODULE_LOADING set to: LAZY GPU models and configuration: GPU 0: NVIDIA RTX A6000 GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A6000 GPU 2: NVIDIA RTX A6000 GPU 3: NVIDIA RTX A6000 GPU 4: NVIDIA RTX A6000 GPU 5: NVIDIA RTX A6000 GPU 6: NVIDIA RTX A6000 GPU 7: NVIDIA RTX A6000 GPU 8: NVIDIA RTX A6000 GPU 9: NVIDIA RTX A6000
Nvidia driver version: 530.30.02 cuDNN version: Could not collect HIP runtime version: N/A MIOpen runtime version: N/A Is XNNPACK available: True
CPU: Architecture: x86_64 CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit Address sizes: 52 bits physical, 57 bits virtual Byte Order: Little Endian CPU(s): 104 On-line CPU(s) list: 0-103 Vendor ID: GenuineIntel Model name: Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 5320 CPU @ 2.20GHz CPU family: 6 Model: 106 Thread(s) per core: 2 Core(s) per socket: 26 Socket(s): 2 Stepping: 6 CPU max MHz: 3400.0000 CPU min MHz: 800.0000 BogoMIPS: 4400.00 Flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc art arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl xtopology nonstop_tsc cpuid aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 sdbg fma cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid dca sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic movbe popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm abm 3dnowprefetch cpuid_fault epb cat_l3 invpcid_single intel_ppin ssbd mba ibrs ibpb stibp ibrs_enhanced tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid ept_ad fsgsbase tsc_adjust bmi1 avx2 smep bmi2 erms invpcid cqm rdt_a avx512f avx512dq rdseed adx smap avx512ifma clflushopt clwb intel_pt avx512cd sha_ni avx512bw avx512vl xsaveopt xsavec xgetbv1 xsaves cqm_llc cqm_occup_llc cqm_mbm_total cqm_mbm_local split_lock_detect wbnoinvd dtherm ida arat pln pts avx512vbmi umip pku ospke avx512_vbmi2 gfni vaes vpclmulqdq avx512_vnni avx512_bitalg tme avx512_vpopcntdq la57 rdpid fsrm md_clear pconfig flush_l1d arch_capabilities Virtualization: VT-x L1d cache: 2.4 MiB (52 instances) L1i cache: 1.6 MiB (52 instances) L2 cache: 65 MiB (52 instances) L3 cache: 78 MiB (2 instances) NUMA node(s): 2 NUMA node0 CPU(s): 0-25,52-77 NUMA node1 CPU(s): 26-51,78-103 Vulnerability Itlb multihit: Not affected Vulnerability L1tf: Not affected Vulnerability Mds: Not affected Vulnerability Meltdown: Not affected Vulnerability Mmio stale data: Mitigation; Clear CPU buffers; SMT vulnerable Vulnerability Retbleed: Not affected Vulnerability Spec store bypass: Mitigation; Speculative Store Bypass disabled via prctl and seccomp Vulnerability Spectre v1: Mitigation; usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization Vulnerability Spectre v2: Mitigation; Enhanced IBRS, IBPB conditional, RSB filling, PBRSB-eIBRS SW sequence Vulnerability Srbds: Not affected Vulnerability Tsx async abort: Not affected
Versions of relevant libraries: [pip3] mypy-extensions==1.0.0 [pip3] numpy==1.26.4 [pip3] torch==2.3.0 [pip3] torch_cluster==1.6.3+pt23cu121 [pip3] torch-ema==0.3 [pip3] torch_geometric==2.5.3 [pip3] torch-runstats==0.2.0 [pip3] torch_scatter==2.1.2+pt23cu121 [pip3] torch_sparse==0.6.18+pt23cu121 [pip3] torch_spline_conv==1.2.2+pt23cu121 [pip3] torchaudio==2.3.0 [pip3] torchvision==0.18.0 [pip3] triton==2.3.0 [conda] numpy 1.26.4 pypi_0 pypi [conda] torch 2.3.0 pypi_0 pypi [conda] torch-cluster 1.6.3+pt23cu121 pypi_0 pypi [conda] torch-ema 0.3 pypi_0 pypi [conda] torch-geometric 2.5.3 pypi_0 pypi [conda] torch-runstats 0.2.0 pypi_0 pypi [conda] torch-scatter 2.1.2+pt23cu121 pypi_0 pypi [conda] torch-sparse 0.6.18+pt23cu121 pypi_0 pypi [conda] torch-spline-conv 1.2.2+pt23cu121 pypi_0 pypi [conda] torchaudio 2.3.0 pypi_0 pypi [conda] torchvision 0.18.0 pypi_0 pypi [conda] triton 2.3.0 pypi_0 pypi
Additional context
I checked relevant code and a straightforward fix seems to be to include an additional if clause in
ScaledDotProduct.forward
such that it constructs aSparseCS
mask instead of anAttentionMask
. This fix will not support additive masks so it might not be ideal.This gives
the output is
the output is
Further investigation is needed for it to work with float mask.