Currently the CPU2 bits define the 6502 variant, if CPU=0.
For CPU=1 no further definition is given for CPU2.
I want to clarify this like so:
CPU2 combinations for CPU=1:
%0000 : 65816 in native mode
others : not defined yet
In general, CPU=0 should define basic 64k type CPU (with minor exceptions like the 65ce02 or 65816 in emulation mode), whereas CPU=1 should define more advanced CPU variants that allow for a larger address space more natively.
fachat
commented
4 weeks ago
Currently the CPU2 bits define the 6502 variant, if CPU=0.
For CPU=1 no further definition is given for CPU2.
I want to clarify this like so:
In general, CPU=0 should define basic 64k type CPU (with minor exceptions like the 65ce02 or 65816 in emulation mode), whereas CPU=1 should define more advanced CPU variants that allow for a larger address space more natively.
Potential candidates are