Originally reported by: Dominik Neise (Bitbucket: dneise, GitHub: dneise)
Hi,
I just happened to look at two Distributions of HillasLength and HillasWidth and saw that both the mean and the maximum value are highest for Width rather than Length. I would naively assume it to be the other way round.
I must say, the data I analysed were not real data but JAFS simulated data, but never the less Width should always be smaller than Length ... this is not the case, as one can also see in Length_vs_Width.png.
Originally reported by: Dominik Neise (Bitbucket: dneise, GitHub: dneise)
Hi, I just happened to look at two Distributions of HillasLength and HillasWidth and saw that both the mean and the maximum value are highest for Width rather than Length. I would naively assume it to be the other way round.
I must say, the data I analysed were not real data but JAFS simulated data, but never the less Width should always be smaller than Length ... this is not the case, as one can also see in Length_vs_Width.png.