As a volunteer, I want to get an overview over all available missions for me, so that I can choose the one that fits me best.
Right now there is very little spacing, the font size is rather small and the colors seem a bit overwhelming.
Maybe push the fontsize from 12 to 14 pt in the cards?
The usability test (https://maze.design/r/jwxm11bufkgchwedq) found that the dashboard had a high drop-off and misclick rate. Many users were not able to find the drop-off instructions. This might need more work than just spacings and realigning.
The following other remarks were made about the structure of the dashboard:
Suggested for you...based on what criteria? location? profile info?
Time estimate for mission would be helpfuls so 'Two fruit box deliveries from home to point A to point B and then point c will likely take 40 mins driving. This is key info for volunteers to accept missions and also for organisations to be able to meet quotes of donations.
I think the expand/collapse isn't really needed. Perhaps a 'save for later' Typically a vol organisation will need to call a volunteer before they actually 'take on a task' its to absolutely ensure it will happen!
An image of the food box size is useful
Preferred volunteer is a bit odd and kind of makes me feel weird as a volunteer, is it a competition?
What is the function of the map vs the list. Users tend to click map pins by default but this visual area is too small to add value to a pin click. Advise making maps per mission card or making map an alternative viewing mission process via tapping, scrolling and going into mission 'pages'
Filter list link/button is missing or unclear how you toggle this on/off
Menu nav should be tested in non-english languages I think the titles will liking go very long in languages like German and Portugese.
Consider labels like 'Mission 1' Mission 2' or even allocating a number code like mission #1297 that way tracking for orgs and volunteers can be done.
What do you click to see 'mission detail' page? is it the (i)?
Add photo of delivery very good feature but needs a good example re. privacy so not having a recievers face or house number in photo shot.
The user clicks accept and then a second accept button - consider changing the first 'accept' to see mission details or similar.
The differences between available, schdeuled and in progress as titles is easy to miss. I suggest a way to show the content has changed from one state to another by chaning either typography size, colour or transition animation to a new page. Some kind of icon system for available, scheduled and in pogress might also be worthwhile investigating.
Do we really need drop shadows on the cards? Do we even need cards at all? re. material Ui says that's a component but why not just page content.
Noticing that the slide global menu nav and the tab nav have different options. Consider investigation having the slide global nav having all nav options.
Re-Label the button to accept a mission on the dashboard as the button label on the detail page for the mission is also labeled "accept" and it might be confusing for the user to click an accept button twice to actually accept.
As a volunteer, I want to get an overview over all available missions for me, so that I can choose the one that fits me best.
Right now there is very little spacing, the font size is rather small and the colors seem a bit overwhelming. Maybe push the fontsize from 12 to 14 pt in the cards?
The usability test (https://maze.design/r/jwxm11bufkgchwedq) found that the dashboard had a high drop-off and misclick rate. Many users were not able to find the drop-off instructions. This might need more work than just spacings and realigning.
The following other remarks were made about the structure of the dashboard:
Suggested for you...based on what criteria? location? profile info?
Time estimate for mission would be helpfuls so 'Two fruit box deliveries from home to point A to point B and then point c will likely take 40 mins driving. This is key info for volunteers to accept missions and also for organisations to be able to meet quotes of donations.
I think the expand/collapse isn't really needed. Perhaps a 'save for later' Typically a vol organisation will need to call a volunteer before they actually 'take on a task' its to absolutely ensure it will happen!
An image of the food box size is useful
Preferred volunteer is a bit odd and kind of makes me feel weird as a volunteer, is it a competition?
What is the function of the map vs the list. Users tend to click map pins by default but this visual area is too small to add value to a pin click. Advise making maps per mission card or making map an alternative viewing mission process via tapping, scrolling and going into mission 'pages'
Filter list link/button is missing or unclear how you toggle this on/off
Menu nav should be tested in non-english languages I think the titles will liking go very long in languages like German and Portugese.
Consider labels like 'Mission 1' Mission 2' or even allocating a number code like mission #1297 that way tracking for orgs and volunteers can be done.
What do you click to see 'mission detail' page? is it the (i)?
Add photo of delivery very good feature but needs a good example re. privacy so not having a recievers face or house number in photo shot.
The user clicks accept and then a second accept button - consider changing the first 'accept' to see mission details or similar.
The differences between available, schdeuled and in progress as titles is easy to miss. I suggest a way to show the content has changed from one state to another by chaning either typography size, colour or transition animation to a new page. Some kind of icon system for available, scheduled and in pogress might also be worthwhile investigating.
Do we really need drop shadows on the cards? Do we even need cards at all? re. material Ui says that's a component but why not just page content.
Noticing that the slide global menu nav and the tab nav have different options. Consider investigation having the slide global nav having all nav options.
Re-Label the button to accept a mission on the dashboard as the button label on the detail page for the mission is also labeled "accept" and it might be confusing for the user to click an accept button twice to actually accept.