Closed ennerf closed 9 months ago
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!
0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
18 Code Smells
No Coverage information
0.0% Duplication
Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: +0.11%
:tada:
Comparison is base (
3846311
) 47.90% compared to head (19653ba
) 48.01%.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Hey there! I see you need help summarizing the previous results to write a Pull request review markdown doc. Let's get started!
io.fair_acc.dataset.benchmark
to io.fair_acc.bench
in multiple files.AggregateDurationMeasure
class package from io.fair_acc.dataset.benchmark
to io.fair_acc.bench
.BenchLevel
class package from io.fair_acc.dataset.benchmark
to io.fair_acc.bench
.DurationMeasure
class package from io.fair_acc.dataset.benchmark
to io.fair_acc.bench
.Measurable
interface package from io.fair_acc.dataset.benchmark
to io.fair_acc.bench
.MeasurementRecorder
class package from io.fair_acc.dataset.benchmark
to io.fair_acc.bench
.RecordingDurationMeasure
class package from io.fair_acc.dataset.benchmark
to io.fair_acc.bench
.TimeMeasure
class package from io.fair_acc.dataset.benchmark
to io.fair_acc.bench
.Chart
class package from io.fair_acc.chartfx
to io.fair_acc.chartfx
.XYChart
class package from io.fair_acc.chartfx
to io.fair_acc.chartfx
.Axis
interface package from io.fair_acc.chartfx.axes
to io.fair_acc.chartfx.axes
.HdrHistogramRecorder.java
, line 1-7, consider changing the package name from io.fair_acc.chartfx.benchmark
to io.fair_acc.chartfx.bench
.HdrHistogramRecorder.java
, line 9-10, consider changing the import statements from io.fair_acc.dataset.benchmark
to io.fair_acc.bench
.LiveDisplayRecorder.java
, line 1-4, consider changing the package name from io.fair_acc.chartfx.benchmark
to io.fair_acc.chartfx.bench
.LiveDisplayRecorder.java
, line 6-7, consider changing the import statements from io.fair_acc.dataset.benchmark
to io.fair_acc.bench
.LiveDisplayRecorder.java
, line 48, consider changing the method visibility from private
to public
.LiveDisplayRecorder.java
, line 51, consider changing the method name from...DataSetLock.java
, the import statement import io.fair_acc.dataset.benchmark.Measurable;
was changed to import io.fair_acc.bench.Measurable;
. Make sure this change doesn't introduce any compatibility issues or break any dependencies.AbstractDataSet.java
, the import statement import io.fair_acc.dataset.benchmark.MeasurementRecorder;
was changed to import io.fair_acc.bench.MeasurementRecorder;
. Make sure this change doesn't introduce any compatibility issues or break any dependencies.AbstractDataSet.java
, the import statement import io.fair_acc.dataset.benchmark.DurationMeasure;
was changed to import io.fair_acc.bench.DurationMeasure;
. Make sure this change doesn't introduce any compatibility issues or break any dependencies.AbstractDataSet.java
, the following code snippet can be refactored for better readability:
import io.fair_acc.dataset.locks.DefaultDataSetLock;
Overall rating: 7.5/10 Criteria: readability, performance, security Brief explanation: The code is generally readable, but could benefit from more comments and explanations. Performance and security aspects seem to be fine.
That's it! I hope this summary helps you with your Pull request review. If you need any further assistance, feel free to ask!
Simple PR that moves the benchmark classes to a dedicated module that is compatible with jdk8.
This allows it to be used in older code bases that can't depend on dataset (jdk11).