Closed airswing closed 4 years ago
Thanks for reporting this. I was able to reproduce it. Your expectations are indeed how it should behave and there is clearly a bug here. I will get to work on it and also update the documentation to correct the outdated file entry.
When I try the examples in the CLI Guide and run:
The hash for at least the first example file isn't matching the downloaded file. The hashes in the documentation should be updated.
More importantly, I notice that when you provide the wrong or outdated SHA256 file hash in the remote file manifest and try to update the hash after, it doesn't update the hash in
manifest-sha256.txt
. It says to remove the data files associated with the mismatch. I do that, then try to update the hashes again with--update --remote-file-manifest ./test-fetch-manifest.json
, and when I do a--resolve-fetch all
followed by--validate full
, the hash still hasn't updated and still fails to validate.I tried adding a new file to the
test-fetch-manifest.json
and ran--update --remote-file-manifest ./test-fetch-manifest.json
and noticed the new file was added as expected to themanifest-sha256.txt
as well asfetch.txt
.My expectations as a user are that when you run an
--update --remote-file-manifest ./manifest.json
, themanifest-*.txt
in the bdbag should be overwritten when noticing pre-existing files have new hashes.