Provide good container securityContext by default for each chart

[jemag]

Motivation This would improve the default security out of the box for helm chart users. If the containers currently support it, there isn't much downside to improving the default security.

It also helps clarifying to the end-user that these values are officially supported and will not cause any problem with the containers (e.g.: readOnlyRootFilesystem: true could for example cause problems for containers expecting to write to specific directories). By having them already specified, the end-user does not need to do extensive testing to ensure it does not cause any issue.

Feature

Have each Helm chart container securityContext provide the highest default that they can sustain. For example, this would, in general, be a good default in line with Kubernetes PSS (https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/security/pod-security-standards/) to try and reach towards (obviously just a target, not possible to attain for falco itself):

securityContext:
  allowPrivilegeEscalation: false
  capabilities:
    drop:
    - ALL
  readOnlyRootFilesystem: true
  runAsNonRoot: true
  runAsUser: 1000
  seccompProfile:
    type: RuntimeDefault

Alternatives Each end-user has to do extensive testing to figure out which securityContext setting is appropriate and which may cause problem. This is also risky since some settings may not cause errors until the container has been running for a while.

Additional context

Falco sidekick does not currently provide any securityContext nor a commented one : https://github.com/falcosecurity/charts/blob/6fff4e1e75c43af742596f478bf86e7723aa08da/falcosidekick/values.yaml#L23-L24 This then leaves the end-user to do extensive testing on his own to figure out the highest/optimal securityContext

Falco exporter does not provide default securityContext but gives some better suggestion through comment:https://github.com/falcosecurity/charts/blob/6fff4e1e75c43af742596f478bf86e7723aa08da/falco-exporter/values.yaml#L73-L80 It would be great to have a good default provided out of the box as suggested in the Feature section

Event-generator seems to be in a similar situation as falco-exporter

Falco itself is very hard to find the optimal securityContext for the end-user. There are currently some default configuration implemented, but they are not all working at the moment (see https://github.com/falcosecurity/falco/issues/2487). It would be nice to have a strong default securityContext here as well, especially since it is not easy to find the appropriate settings in each context (e.g.: ebpf, modern-bpf, module, etc.) In this case, the securityContext would be dynamically computed.

[jemag]

This would cover and close https://github.com/falcosecurity/charts/issues/425 as well

[leogr]

cc @alacuku @therealbobo @Andreagit97

[therealbobo]

I'm already taking a look at this possible enhancement: it's just matter of finding the minimum set of privileges needed (e.g. falco-exporter needs to run as root).

[leogr]

I'm already taking a look at this possible enhancement: it's just matter of finding the minimum set of privileges needed (e.g. falco-exporter needs to run as root).

Actually, not just falco-exporter, but any application needs to connect to the gRPC socket.

[jemag]

Thank you for looking into it.

As a side note, it seems a bit misleading to have these comments in falco-exporter values if it needs to be run as root (instead of nonRoot and user 1000): https://github.com/falcosecurity/charts/blob/6fff4e1e75c43af742596f478bf86e7723aa08da/falco-exporter/values.yaml#L73-L80

[therealbobo]

Totally agree. In a short time I'll open a pr with the comments removed and an actual securityContext written adhoc for each container. 😄

[poiana]

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.

Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Provide feedback via https://github.com/falcosecurity/community.

/lifecycle stale

[jemag]

/remove-lifecycle stale

[R011y]

Any update here?

[leogr]

/remove-lifecycle stale

cc @alacuku

[leogr]

/help

[poiana]

@leogr: This request has been marked as needing help from a contributor.

Please ensure the request meets the requirements listed here.

If this request no longer meets these requirements, the label can be removed by commenting with the /remove-help command.

In response to [this](https://github.com/falcosecurity/charts/issues/481): >/help Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.

[R011y]

WE CAN DO IT GUYS <3

[poiana]

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.

Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Provide feedback via https://github.com/falcosecurity/community.

/lifecycle stale

[jemag]

/remove-lifecycle stale

[leogr]

Is anyone working on this? :thinking:

[kek-Sec]

this should be updated , its common for clusters to have

allowPrivilegeEscalation=false

[poiana]

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.

Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Provide feedback via https://github.com/falcosecurity/community.

/lifecycle stale

[poiana]

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Provide feedback via https://github.com/falcosecurity/community.

/lifecycle rotten

[jemag]

/remove-lifecycle stale

[mike-stewart]

/remove-lifecycle rotten

[poiana]

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.

Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Provide feedback via https://github.com/falcosecurity/community.

/lifecycle stale

[mike-stewart]

/remove-lifecycle stale

[leogr]

@alacuku @Issif any opinion on this?

[Issif]

It's not a so simple topic. Right now, the end user has to fill the whole securityContext object by him/herself. It's very flexible but requires some expertise and attempts.

  securityContext:
      securityContext:
        {{- include "falco.securityContext" . | nindent 8 }}

With Falco which must run in so many different contexts (on-prem, EKS, AKS, GKE, Openshift, Rancher, ...) this is the only method with allows enough flexibility.

[jemag]

out of curiosity, any reason Falco would need widely different securityContext between these environments? (on-prem, eks, aks, etc.)

[jemag]

for example, it seems improbable to me that falcosidekick would vary widely between these different environments. If that is the case, a strong default would make sense.

I could see falco itself needing different capabilities though.

[Issif]

I had in mind Falco, it might imply some tunning for Openshift for example. But I agree, for the simple apps like sidekick, it's not a big deal

[poiana]

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.

Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Provide feedback via https://github.com/falcosecurity/community.

/lifecycle stale

[mike-stewart]

/remove-lifecycle stale